Timothy Habick

Dr. Timothy Habick

Reasoning, Inc.
1341 Gilbert Road
Meadowbrook, PA 19046
Office: 215-275-5388
Introduction

Reasoning, Inc., led by Dr. Timothy Habick, provides expert forensic linguistic services across trademark disputes, defamation, authorship attribution, psychometrics, and more, delivering measurable and impactful outcomes for our clients. With over two decades of experience, we’ve delivered compelling analyses, testimony, and reports for high-stakes legal and business cases globally.

We specialize in evaluations of high-stakes documents such as contracts, surveys, and expert witness reports. Our investigations use linguistic evidence to determine whether questioned textual materials comply with professional standards of clarity, efficiency, and fairness.

We also vigorously defend the communicative adequacy of questioned documents that can be shown to meet the applicable standards.

Since 2000, Reasoning, Inc. has worked with major testing organizations to help create clear, fair, and culturally relevant assessments, achieving successful outcomes that align with professional standards. Clients have included the Law School Admission Council (LSAC), Educational Testing Service (ETS), and the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA), among others. We will apply the same commitment to communicative efficiency, precision, and appropriateness to your case.
________________________________________
Services Offered

• Trademark Disputes: We assess acoustic, phonetic, phonological, lexical, morphological, semantic, and graphic similarities to determine the degree of potential consumer confusion.

• Defamation Analysis: We determine whether derogatory communications satisfy the linguistic criteria for assertions of fact or expressions of opinion, documenting the severity of meaning elements injurious to reputation.

• Authorship Attribution: Using corpus-based and other applicable methodologies, we identify unique linguistic patterns for author identification. We also provide informed opinions on the authorship attributions proposed by other researchers in terms of their sampling, analyses, and congruence with linguistic science.

• Survey Analysis: We analyze surveys and customer response forms for logical, linguistic, pragmatic, and psychometric defects that impact validity.

• Document Evaluation: We evaluate contract terms and other formal communications to determine their single best interpretation, if any.

• Dialectal and Sociolinguistic Issues: We offer expert insight into regional and social language variations and can opine on the most likely and reasonable interpretation of particular speech acts in context.
________________________________________
Notable Case Experience

• Nationwide Insurance & Major International Trade Disputes: Conducted authorship attribution analyses for prominent firms.

• United States v. Tyshon Bey (U.S. District Court, Trenton, NJ): Provided expert testimony on discourse analysis.

• Seals v. State of Mississippi: Contributed linguistic and psychometric evidence to support a claim of unfair educational practices.

• Trademark and Defamation Cases: Worked with Seed IP, Perkins Coie, and Pisanelli-Bice on various trademark and defamation cases.

• Randall Keener et al. v. Second Round Sub, LLC: Defended the communicative sufficiency of a time-barred debt letter.

• Lites v. Amazon.com Services, LLC: Provided evidence showing the communicative inadequacy of Amazon's COBRA election form for separated employees.
________________________________________
Trademark Analysis Methodology


We assess acoustic, linguistic, and pragmatic information for precise trademark analyses. Our methodology:

• Defines measurable features of competing marks for objective comparison.

• Quantifies overlaps in acoustic, semantic, and graphic domains to assess potential confusion.

• Uses spectrographic evidence to highlight acoustic issues when necessary.
________________________________________
Defamation Expertise

We determine whether potentially defamatory communications qualify as assertions of fact and assess the potential harm to an individual's reputation when publicized. (We are not business valuation specialists and do not attempt to determine the economic value of damages.)
________________________________________
AI-Detection Expertise

Dr. Habick provided expert analysis in Krupa Patel v. Tulane University, a case resolved immediately after receipt of his report. The case involved AI-detection software falsely identifying a medical student’s essay as AI-generated. Dr. Habick's report demonstrated that current AI-detection tools can misclassify text authored by highly proficient second-language speakers as AI-generated, due to similarities in lexical richness, syntactic diversity, and grammatical complexity. His findings illuminated biases and limitations inherent in AI-detection tools, underscoring their inability to reliably evaluate texts without human linguistic expertise.

________________________________________
Experience in Multilingual and Bilingual Contexts

Our team’s deep understanding of multilingual issues derives from extensive personal and professional experience. For many years, we helped to create examinations in French, Spanish, and other languages. We helped to translate the GRE General Test into its Spanish version, the PAEG. We have also contributed extensively to the language examinations of the TOEFL program, a cornerstone of English language proficiency testing. In collaboration with a leading peer reviewer who worked for the Defense Language Institute for many years, we have wide-ranging practical experience in crafting multilingual materials for educational and assessment purposes.

Dr. Habick’s abilities in French, Spanish, and Chinese, as well as our experience with bilingual education cases, put us in a position to navigate complex multilingual disputes. In Chu v. Rubin, we authored the "Principles Promoting Trilingualism" report, which outlined a principled basis to make realistic and compassionate choices regarding a child's bilingual educational programs. We identified solutions to achieve the parents' goal of trilingual fluency for their child. Our insights ensure that language acquisition and educational strategies align with both cultural and linguistic best practices.
________________________________________
Scientific, Medical, and Industrial Testing Expertise

Reasoning, Inc. has developed and refined examinations and assessment tools for a variety of specialized fields. We designed a comprehensive suite of examinations for the Building Performance Institute, addressing critical skills for professionals in building science. Additionally, we contributed to the development of the Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology Tests, ensuring that these assessments accurately reflect the required knowledge and competencies for practitioners. Our extensive work with scientific, medical, and industrial testing demonstrates our ability to align linguistic clarity and technical precision with the unique demands of these domains.
________________________________________
Rebuttals of Expert Witness Reports

• Logical Evidence: In a major international case, we exposed over a dozen logical fallacies in the opposing expert's report, demonstrating attempts to mislead the court and a lack of sufficient appropriate linguistic evidence.

• Pragmatic and Psychometric Evidence: In Zimmer, Inc. v. Zimmer MedizinSystems Corporation, we demonstrated that the plaintiff's expert witness report, which relied on an extensive $80,000 survey and otherwise competent psychometric analysis, was based on a false assumption and thus had no probative value. We established that the psychometric report had a fatal sampling deficiency that led only to trivial conclusions that were valueless to the trademark dispute.

• Sociolinguistic and Corpus Evidence: In Malaysia Civil Suit No.: MA-22NCVC-10-02/2020, we showed that the complainant's expert witness had selected a materially inappropriate reference group for authorship identification purposes. We documented that the linguist's two reports relied on flawed random sampling techniques as well as on a sociolinguistically inappropriate corpus.

________________________________________
Unique Expertise in Linguistics, Logic, and Standards of Evidence

Reasoning, Inc. combines linguistic precision and logical analysis with a deep appreciation of professional standards of evidence, as exemplified by generally accepted auditing and accounting principles. These experiences, along with extensive involvement in the development of assessments that evaluate reasoning skills, form the foundation of our rigorous approach to forensic linguistic services.

We emphasize the forensic linguist's responsibility to design and perform linguistic research to obtain sufficient appropriate linguistic evidence that supports the conclusions on which opinions are based.

Founded by a team of linguists and logicians with decades of experience in shaping high-stakes standards, Reasoning, Inc. delivers clear, compelling, and evidence-based solutions, grounded in a steadfast commitment to meticulous analysis and fairness.

Reasoning, Inc. continuously refines its methods and tools, integrating advancements in linguistic science, psychometrics, and forensic methodologies. You can trust us to meet or exceed all professional standards of practice in our efforts to help you address your language-related challenges.

________________________________________
Commitment to Ethical Practice

At Reasoning, Inc., we are committed to ethical and transparent communication. We offer science-based analyses and only support cases for which sufficient appropriate linguistic evidence is available or discoverable. If the evidence doesn't support your case, we will provide timely, candid feedback to help you to refine your strategies and avoid pursuing misguided argumentation in litigation. Our dedication to fairness ensures that all opinions are based on rigorous standards and integrity.

________________________________________
Contact Information

To discuss your case or request a preliminary consultation, contact Dr. Timothy Habick:

• Email: thabick@reasoninginc.com

• Phone: (215) 275-5388

We look forward to partnering with you to address your language-related concerns.


Areas of Expertise
  • Audio
  • Contracts
  • Defamation
  • Demonstrative Evidence/Exhibits
  • Language & Linguistics
  • Patents
  • Police Procedures
  • Public Contracts
  • Spectroscopy
  • Trademarks

Expert Background
Q: Please list your professional accreditations, degrees, licenses, and certificates granted:
A: Ph.D.- Linguistics, 1980, University of Illinois, Urbana
B.A.- French, maxima cum laude, 1971 La Salle University, Philadelphia
Q: Please list your affiliations or memberships in any professional and/or industry organizations:
A: International Association of Forensic Linguists
Germanic Society of Forensic Linguistics
International Language and Law Association
Q: Please list any teaching or speaking experience you have had, including subject matter:
A: Dr. Habick has taught linguistics and English at Temple University, La Salle University, and the University of Illinois. He is a frequent speaker at professional conferences and workshops.

Q: Have any of your accreditations ever been investigated, suspended or removed? (if yes, explain)
A: NO.
Q: On how many occasions have you been retained as an expert?
A: Innumerable times since 2010
Q: For what area(s) of expertise have you been retained as an expert?
A: English Syntax; Linguistic Analysis of Various Documents; Trademarks; Authorship Attribution;
Libel, Slander, Invasion of Privacy; Copyright Infringement; Unfair tests, grading, and educational practices; Interpretation of Contracts; Analysis of Secretly Taped Messages.

Q: In what percentage of your cases were you retained by the plaintiff?
A: Approximately 50 percent.
Q: In what percentage of your cases were you retained by the defendant?
A: Approximately 50 percent.
Q: On how many occasions have you had your deposition taken?
A: Three
Q: When was the last time you had your deposition taken?
A: 2022
Q: On how many occasions have you been qualified by a court to give expert testimony?
A: Unknown - Often cases are settled prior to actual testimony.
Q: On how many occasions have you testified as an expert in court or before an arbitrator?
A: Twice
Q: For how many years have you worked with the legal industry as an expert?
A: Since 2010
Q: What services do you offer? (E.g.: consulting, testing, reports, site inspections etc.)
A: Case Evaluations / Initial Reviews;
Analyses and Reports;
Discovery Assistance;
Testimony.
Q: What is your hourly rate to consult with an attorney?
A: Information provided upon request.
Q: What is your hourly rate to review documents?
A: Information provided upon request.
Q: What is your hourly rate to provide deposition testimony?
A: Information provided upon request.
Q: What is your hourly rate to provide testimony at trial?
A: Information provided upon request.
Q: Please list any fees other than those stated above (E.g.: travel expenses, copy fees, etc.)
A: Information provided upon request.


References

Stefan Blum | Perkins Coie LLP
1201 Third Avenue Suite 4900
Seattle, WA 98101-3099
206.359.3243

David Oakley
Anderl & Oakley
20 Nassau Street, Suite 208
Princeton, New Jersey 08542
(609) 921-1755 (office)
(908) 489-4831
davidrobertoakley@gmail.com

Jeffrey B. Fabian (813.676.7212)
Mindi M. Richter (813.227.2254)
C. Philip Campbell, Jr. (813.227.2346)
Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick
Bank of America Plaza
101 E. Kennedy Boulevard
Suite 2800
Tampa, FL 33602
lnelson@slk-law.com (Lori Nelson)

Debra Spinelli
Pisanelli Bice, PLLC
3883 Howard Hughes Parkway
Suite 800
Las Vegas, NV 89169
702-214-2100 (General)
702.214.2104 (Sarah Elsden)
see@pisanellibice.com